Investigating Representation Ethos Émotif in 2007 French Presidential Election
Abstract
The issue of immigration became prominent in French political discourse in 2005 that leads to debate about France and nationalism. During the lead-up to the 2007 French Presidential election, various concepts of a French national identity were promoted by candidates: Nicolas Sarkozy, Ségolene Royal, François Bayrou, and Jean-Marie Le Pen. Candidates gave particular attention to ethos, specifically ethos émotif. In this article, the researcher will characterize the ethos émotif presented by the four candidates mentioned above. The ethos will be then examined whether it were successfully embodied in these candidates' speeches by investigating the public reaction they received based on articles published in the French media. This research will apply a critical discourse analysis and interactional sociolinguistics approach using elements of interaction formulated by Stébe (2008) and Kerbrat-Orecchioni (1990). Data will be classified using the software LEXICO 3.
Downloads
References
Auchlin, A. (2000). Ethos et expérience du discours. In M. Wauthion, & A. Simon, Politesse et Idéologie (pp. 75–93). Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.
Baider, F., & Constantinou, M. (2015). Jean-Marie Le Pen vs. Marine Le Pen: un ethos émotif différent? Studia Romanica Posnaniensia Vol. 42, No. 4, 3–19.
Barthes, R. (1962). L'ancienne rhétorique. Communications , 172-223.
Charaudeau, P. (2007). Analyse du discours et communication. L'un dans l'autre ou l'autre dans l'un? Semen, 23.
Goffman, E. (1974). Les cadres de l'expérience, trad de l'anglais par I Joseph M. Datevelle. Paris: Ed. de Minuit.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1990). Les interactions verbales, tome 1. Paris: A Colin.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stébé, J. M. (2008). Risques et enjeux de l'interaction social. Paris: Lavoisier.
Williams, M. H. (2011). A new era for French far right politics? Comparing the FN under two Le Pens. Análise Social, Vol. 46, No. 201, 679-695.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License