Stuck in a Moral Prison: Exploring the Roots of Why Indonesian Students Moralize Literature

  • Danielle E. Donelson-Sims Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga
Keywords: Morals, literature, EFL classroom, teaching, class discussion


This paper explores a belief in Indonesian culture, held by educators and students, that literature teaches morals. While learning literature offers a potential benefit, a problem arises when instilling and/or recycling moral knowledge is recognized as the only reason to learn literature. When identifying established morals becomes the stopping point, other elements may be ignored, such as critical thinking, culture, history, perspectives, and marginalization. Four literature lecturers and seven students were interviewed. Data revealed all participants had varying definitions of “morals,” leading to potential classroom confusion. All participants agreed morals ought to be considered, but only the (majority of) students identified them as the most important in literary study. Additionally, not all students enjoyed finding morals; some were rather bored by examining morals. Lastly, most participants believed Indonesian culture and education contributes to the habit of searching for morals, and valuing them at the expense of other learning benefits.


Download data is not yet available.


Bonadanna, R. R. (1999). “Doing military ethics with war literature.” JSCOPE99/Bonadanna99.html.
Carroll, N. (2002). The wheel of virtue: Art, literature, and moral knowledge. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60(1), 3-26.
Crary, A. (2000). Does the study of literature belong within moral philosophy: Reflections in the light of Ryle‟s thought. Philosophical Investigations, 23(4), 315-350.
Cresswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Lincoln, Nebraska: Sage Publications.
Jenkins, B. C. (1997). Aristotle comes to the literature circle. Journal of Education, 179(3), 59-79.
Josselson, R. (2004). The hermeneutics of faith and the hermeneutics of suspicion. Narrative Inquiries, 14(1), 1-28.
Kirk, R. (1981). The moral imagination. Literature and Belief, 1, 37-49.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Pantic, N. (2006). Moral education through literature. IPI, 38(2), 401-414.
Plato. (2008). The republic. (B. Jowett, Trans.) Retrieved from ebooks/1497.
Taylor, D. (1995). The ethical implications of storytelling. Mars Hill Review, 3, 58-70.
Wiggins, A. (2011). Not teaching ethics: Let students learn ethics by experiencing ethical behavior through Socratic seminar. Kappan Magazine, 93(1), 33-35.
How to Cite
Donelson-Sims, D. E. (2013). Stuck in a Moral Prison: Exploring the Roots of Why Indonesian Students Moralize Literature. K@ta: A Biannual Publication on the Study of Languange and Literature, 15(2), 101-108.