A Comparative Study: Self-Realization in Twentieth-Century Western Thought, Ibn e Arabi's Idea, and Theatre of The Absurd

  • Bahee Hadaegh Shiraz University, Faculty of Foreign Languages & Literature, School of Literature and Humanity Science, Shiraz
Keywords: theatre of the absurd, twentieth century, self, Ibn e Arabi, Freud, Jung


Following humans' struggles to achieve a better under¬standing of the self throughout major historical periods, the idea of the quest for a whole self is once more rekindled in the anxiety-laden atmosphere of the twentieth century. However, unlike the previous approaches, the twentieth century reflection of the notion of the quest for self-realization is paradoxically revealed in a new model of struggle which inclines more toward spiritual search. This inward struggle manifests itself through connecting the ego to the unconscious world, in line with the theories of Freud and Jung. The similarity which exists between Jung's psychic state and the Sufis' mystical world defined by Ibn e Arabi, makes it possible to reconsider the seemingly nihilist readings of the quest for self-realization of the twentieth century absurd thoughts in a positive way


Download data is not yet available.


Bataille, G. (2004). On Nietzsche. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Beckett, S. (1962). Endgame. London: Faber and Faber.

Beckett, S. (1931). Proust. London: Grove Press.

Beckett, S. (1987). Waiting for Godot. H. Bloom, (Ed.). New York, NY: Chelsea House Publishers.

Begley, V. (2005). Harold Pinter and the twilight of modernism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Corbin, H. (2007). Creative imagination in the sufism of Ibn Arabi. London: Taylor & Francis.

Halligan, F.R. (2002). The creative imagination of the Sufimystic, Ibn 'Arabi. Journal of Religion and Health, 40 (2), 275-289. [CrossRef]

Heidegger, M. (1953). Being and time. (J. S. Albany, Trans.). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.

Huskinson, L. (2004). Nietzsche and Jung: The whole self in the union of opposites. Brunner: Routledge.

Jackson, R. (1981). The literature of subversion. London and New York: Routledge. [CrossRef]

Metman, E. (1960). Reflections on Samuel Beckett's plays. Journal of Analytical Psychology. 5 (1), 41-63. [CrossRef]

Myers, F. W. H. (1903). Human personality and its survival of bodily death. (Vols. 1-2). London: Longmans Green.

Nietzsche, F. (1967). The will to power. (W. Kauffman & R.J. Hollingdale, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.

Nietzsche, F. (1999). Thus spoke Zarathustra. London: Dover Publications, Inc.

Roche, M.W. (1998). Tragedy and comedy: A systematic study and a critique of Hegel. New York, NY: Suny Press.

Scheler, M. (1991). On the tragic. In A. Coffin (Ed.), The question of tragedy. San Francisco: Edwin Mellen Press.

Steiner, G. (1970). Heidegger. Sussex: The Harvester Press.

Tolkien, J. R. R. (1975). On fairy stories. London: Tree and Leaf.
Uhlmann, A. (2006). Beckett after Beckett. Florida: University Press of Florida.

Webb, J. (1974). The occult underground. Open Court Publishing Company.
How to Cite
Hadaegh, B. (2012). A Comparative Study: Self-Realization in Twentieth-Century Western Thought, Ibn e Arabi’s Idea, and Theatre of The Absurd. K@ta, 13(2), 188-201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.13.2.188-201