Personal Relationship in Les Murray’s Poem

  • Henriono Nugroho English Department, Faculty of Letters, Jember University, Kalimantan 37, Jember 68121 East Java
Keywords: automatized meaning, foregrounded meaning, subject matter, literary meaning, theme

Abstract

Stylistics is a linguistic analysis on literary and non-literary texts. This article is concerned with a systemic stylistic analysis on a poem in terms of Systemic Functional Linguistics and Verbal Art Semiotics. It uses library research, qualitative data, documentary study, descriptive method and intrinsic-objective approach. The semantic analysis results in both automatized and foregrounded meanings. Then the automatized meaning produces lexical cohesion and in turn, it produces subject matter. Meanwhile, the foregrounded meaning produces the literary meaning and in turn, it creates theme. Finally, the analysis indicates that the subject matter is about daily works, the literary meaning is about the complete severance and the theme is about personal relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Butt, D. (1988). Randomness, order and the latent patterning of text. In D. Birch, & M. O’ Toole (Eds.), Functions of style (pp. 30-44). London: Pinter Publishers.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (1995). Using functional grammar. Sydney: Macquarie University.

Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter Publishers.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Language as a social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C.. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Hasan, R. (1985). Linguistics, language and verbal art. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.

Hasan, R. (1988). The analysis of one poem: Theoretical issues in practice. In D. Birch, & M. O’ Toole (Eds.), Functions of Style (pp. 52-64). London: Pinter Publishers.

Hasan, R. (1996). On teaching literature across cultural distances. In J. E. James (Ed.), The language-culture connection (pp. 45-60). [Anthology series 37]. Singapore: Seameo Regional Language Center

Martin, J. R. (1985). Process and text: Two aspects of semiosis. In J. D. Benson, & W. S. Graves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse (pp. 17-34). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text system and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Mukarovsky, J. (1977). The word and verbal art. (J. Burbank, & P. Steiner, Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Matthiessen, C. (1995). Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo, Taipei, Dallas: International Language Sciences Publishers.

Preminger, A. (1974). Princeton encyclopaedia of poetry and poetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Plum, G. A. (1988). Text and contextual conditioning in spoken English: A genre based approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney.
Published
2009-12-04
How to Cite
Nugroho, H. (2009). Personal Relationship in Les Murray’s Poem. K@ta, 11(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.11.1.52-69
Section
Articles