Entrapment in Relationships in August Strindberg’s The Father and Harold Pinter’s The Collection

  • Samira Sasani Department of Foreign Languages, College of Literature and Humanities, Shiraz University, Eram Square, Shiraz 7194685115
  • Parvin Ghasemi Department of Foreign Languages, College of Literature and Humanities, Shiraz University, Eram Square, Shiraz 7194685115
Keywords: August Strindberg, Harold Pinter, communication theory, The Father, The Collection


Modern drama is replete with different forms of entrapment in relationships and that is August Strindberg. Some authors have acknowledged their indebtedness to him and some have never mentioned it; Pinter is among the latter group. Though this paper does not investigate the influence of Strindberg on Pinter, studying these two plays, one can see the footsteps of Strindberg in Pinter's play. Employing Watzlawick and Laing's communication theory, this paper tries to investigate the shared concept of entrapment in relationships and the resemblance between these two playwrights.


Download data is not yet available.


Bean, H. K. (1994). Vision and gender: Looking relationships in the plays and teleplays of Harold Pinter. Unpublished Doctoral Disser-tation, University of Delaware, Delaware.
Bloom, H. (2011). The anatomy of influence: Litera-ture as a way of life. New Haven: Yale Univer-sity Press.
Breuer, R. (1980). Irony, literature, and schizo-phrenia. New Literary History. 12 (1): 107-118.
Clark, B. H. (1925). A study of the modern drama: A handbook for the study and appreciation of the best plays, European, English, and American, of the last half century. London: D. Appleton and Company.
Dukore, B. F. (1974). The Pinter collection. Edu-cational Theatre Journal. 26 (1): 81-85.
Esslin, M. (1964). The theatre of the absurd. London: Butler and Tanner Ltd.
Fahlgren, M. (2009). Strindberg and the woman question. In M. Robinson (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to August Strindberg (pp. 20-35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilleman, L. (2010). Lars Noren‘s long journey into night. Modern Drama. 53 (2): 211-231.
Gilleman, L. (2008). Mind the gap: Perception and cognition in Harold Pinter‘s confrontation scenes. In F. Gillen and S. Gale (Eds.), The Pinter review: Nobel Prize/Europe Theatre Prize Volume (pp. 68-92). Tampa, FL: U of Tampa P.
Krasner, D. (2012). A history of modern drama. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Laing, R. D. (2002). The self and others: Selected works. London: Taylor & Francis e-library.
Laing, R. D. (1967). The politics of experience. New York: Ballantine Books.
Laing, R. D. (1961). The self and others: Further studies in sanity and madness. London: Tavistock Publications.
Morgan, R. (1978). The range of emotional states in Pinter‘s ‗Collection‘. Educational Theatre Journal. 30 (2): 165-175.
Pinter, H. (1996). The Collection. Harold Pinter: Plays two. London: Faber and Faber Limited.
Rokem, F. (2009). Strindberg and modern drama: Some lines of influence. In Michel Robinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to August Strindberg (pp. 164-175). Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Rokem, F. (2010). Philosophers and thespians: Thinking performance. Stanford: Stanford Uni-versity Press.
Strindberg, A. (1953). Eight famous plays (E. Bjorkman, and N. Erichsen, Trans.). London: Butler and Tanner Ltd.
Watzlawick, P., & Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.